Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) Release Train Engineer Practice Test

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the SAFe Release Train Engineer Exam with our comprehensive test. Utilize flashcards and multiple choice questions for effective study. Each question includes hints and explanations. Get exam-ready now!

Practice this question and more.

What is one risk of eliminating an Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration?

Technical debt can grow uncontrollably
Teams have no time for fixing bugs
Bottlenecks can be hard to identify and resolve
Delivery can be blocked

The correct answer is: Technical debt can grow uncontrollably

Eliminating an Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration poses the risk of allowing technical debt to grow uncontrollably. The IP Iteration serves as a dedicated time for teams to innovate, experiment, and address technical debt, which includes necessary refactoring, addressing architectural improvements, and implementing enhancements that improve system performance and maintainability. Without this dedicated iteration, teams may prioritize feature development or immediate product delivery over these critical activities, leading to a buildup of technical debt. As the codebase becomes more complex and less maintainable, future development can become increasingly challenging, ultimately affecting the team's ability to innovate and deliver value effectively. In this context, while teams may still be able to fix bugs and address bottlenecks during regular iterations, the absence of the IP Iteration specifically dedicated to innovation and planning limits their ability to manage these aspects thoroughly. Additionally, delivery issues may arise if the foundational technical elements are not continuously refined, but the primary risk directly associated with the elimination of the IP Iteration is the unchecked accumulation of technical debt.